The Arab Spring, especially in Egypt, is over. The arctic
summer which followed was short lived and fall is fast approaching. The northerlies
began to blow and the long cold winter is about to set in. Soon the long arctic nights will blanket the
land.
What gave us hope to think otherwise? Democracy is a profoundly Western concept. We
own it. It has its roots in Greek antiquity; it developed slowly and
torturously in Europe, made its way to the New World, and finally was accepted
by the western world as the expression of the highest form of our collective
political development. We were so enamoured by this system that after WWII we
began to graft this system on to the bodies of Asia and Africa, and more
recently on East Europe and the Middle East.
We compared socialist systems with democracy and rightly found them
wanting. We looked at oriental despotism in its various forms, and found them
to be unquestionably unacceptable. So, we came to the conclusion that democracy
is far better than anything else on offer. George W. Bush said: “ I believe that freedom is the deepest
need of every human soul “. (April, 2004) This was accepted as a truism;
it became mandatory for all nations to adopt democracy and those countries that
balked found themselves ostracised. Unless, the country is rich in oil.
I would argue that the demonstrators that toppled Mubarak were not
representative of the broad spectrum of the Egyptian population. Like many others, I sat glued to the TV and
following the protest on the internet. What I saw was a large number of young
men and women, primarily students or recent graduates, well dressed, well
spoken and articulate. Most spoke good English. These people embraced western
ideas, and were demanding a say in the decision making process and, more than
anything else, they wanted jobs. Overwhelmingly they were scions from families
that were not part of the elite, had no political clout or social influence.
They laboured to give their children an education and a chance for a better
life. However, there is a downside to education: it creates expectations, and
when these expectations are not suitably addressed, it leads to discontent. These
young people, armed with mobile phones, twitters, and face books, made the
revolution happen without really knowing what they were doing. They were neither organised nor did they have
clearly defined goals. The election
which followed proved this: the farmers who live under near-feudal conditions,
the uneducated masses who are fundamentally conservative, the religious that
are numerous, voted for the religious parties, including the Muslim
Brotherhood. The people who started the revolution, i.e. the young educated and
westernised elite, were left out in the cold.
Morsi will, or, I should say, already has, bulldozed the new
constitution through the parliament and by doing so, set the country on the
road to becoming an Islamic republic. The constitution will then go to the
people for endorsement, a referendum. I have no doubt whatsoever that it will
receive overwhelming support because the majority of people in Egypt, as
elsewhere in the Arab world, are conservative and suspicious of western ideas. Moreover,
questions will be couched in such a manner as to make its acceptance of the
constitution a foregone conclusion.
Finally, there is the question of the military. In
most countries, there is a clear delineation between the role of the army and
the police. The latter is there to ensure that the laws of the country are
obeyed; the former to protect the country from outside enemies. In democratic
countries any blurring of these lines are not tolerated. In the Arab world, and indeed some other
countries, often the role of the army is to support the government. It
certainly was the case in Egypt; only when this support was withdrawn, did
Mubarak’s regime fall. Quite often the
military also act as a bastion against religious extremism, as in the case of
Turkey, Pakistan and Egypt, at least in the past. Now a major problem is about
to develop: Egypt is the second largest recipient of US military aid. The
Egyptian military is keen for this to continue. Meanwhile, politically, Egypt
is drifting towards becoming an Islamic state, and the Muslim Brotherhood which
is the spiritual godfather of the global Islamist movement, is jockeying for a
more prominent role in the Arab world, a situation which cannot possibly be in
the interest of US. Should that happen,
military aid to Egypt would surely be reviewed.
Or the military will step in and put an end to the
Brotherhood and the new Pharaoh.
Yes Eric..you have way too much time on your hands.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit that my knowledge of the Middle East is lacking as has been my knowledge of Australian political history and our version of democracy. What I have learn of our recent political history though has stunned me and our version of democracy is not what I thought it was.
In fact I would say that in some states (particularly Qld) democracy is long gone - the abolition of the lower house against the wishes of the people expressed by referendum a point in case.
On a federal level though the acts of treason performed by whitlam in effectively establishing a new country with a new monetary unit to operate right alongside the Commonwealth of Australia without us even understanding what he had done was an act of incredible courage that being allowed to happen created the recessions of the 70's , 90's and down the financial mess that we are about to step into.. and all can be traced back to his single most significant act of treason - that that successive governemnt have upheld at the behest of the United Nations and the world banking elite.
For all I know you may very well be right, my friend. However, I do have to admit that economics is a mystery to me and is likely to remain so as I am too old to learn new tricks. I did not know that Whitlam had THAT much to answer for.
DeleteRegards,
Eric
That I guess is the point of politics isn't it to gain power either within a nation or to be able to exert control over another.
ReplyDeleteThe most effective method of control it turns out is economic control.
Open your wallet and you will find that the notes now say 'legal tender in Australia" before 1973 they actually said Legal Tender in the Commonwealth of Australia...
A subtle but significant difference the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia requires that legal tender be backed by Gold and Silver ( section 115) unable to change that Whitlam effectivly created a new republic " Australia" who's currency is a fiat currency the impacts of that are highly significant and related to the debt crisis.
Of course this is the measure of democracy, and here unfortunately was the death of democracy in our country
THANKS. INTERESTING OBSERVATION.
ReplyDeleteI CERTAINLY SEE YOUR ARGUEMENT THAT WHITLAM'S ACTIONS UNDERMINED OUR CURRENCY, BUT HOW DID IT SPELL THE END OF DEMOCRACY?
ERIC